Sorry / Thanks Mr.Eggleston

Ongoing Work

When a writer references another’s work, they use quotation marks or attribution, acknowledging the lineage of ideas. Umberto Eco observed that postmodern consciousness thrives on this awareness of intertextuality: We don’t say things naively; instead, we recognise and name those who have told them before.

But how does one “quote” in photography? The visual language of previous generations shapes how we see, yet when a moment before us echoes their work, how do we respond? Should we capture and share, as the medium’s immediacy encourages? Or appreciate it viscerally without photographing it. Is there a way to thoughtfully acknowledge and share this connection with others? 

If I photograph a green bathroom reminiscent of William Eggleston’s work, am I borrowing, quoting, or looking through his eyes? Would he scowl and think I’ve stolen something mindlessly? Or would he chuckle and say, Ah, they get it! This tension fascinates me: the line between homage and originality, influence and imitation.

Through photography, I engage in a dialogue with those who came before me—to converse, reflect, and expand the narrative they began. Here, my work seeks to acknowledge the continuity of visual culture as an ongoing exchange. I’m nodding at all the other artists who taught me how to see. 

So, to Eggleston and others, I wonder: Am I saying, “Sorry, I couldn’t leave it without taking a picture,” or might this also be my way of saying, “Thank you?”